<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Monash Liberals &#187; Schoolarship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monashliberals.org/tag/schoolarship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monashliberals.org</link>
	<description>Education &#38; SEO Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California set to be the first state to have a &#8220;Bill of Rights&#8221; for college athletes?</title>
		<link>http://www.monashliberals.org/california-set-to-be-the-first-state-to-have-a-bill-of-rights-for-college-athletes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monashliberals.org/california-set-to-be-the-first-state-to-have-a-bill-of-rights-for-college-athletes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schoolarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monashliberals.org/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



 It&#8217;s a well-intentioned idea that aims to help protect student-athletes              from exploitation, but California State Senate Bill 193 – the              Student-Athletes&#8217; Bill of Rights – simply poses too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<table id="AutoNumber1" style="border-collapse: collapse; height: 452px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" bordercolor="#111111">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="85%" height="452"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> It&#8217;s a well-intentioned idea that aims to help protect student-athletes              from exploitation, but California State Senate Bill 193 – the              Student-Athletes&#8217; Bill of Rights – simply poses too much risk for              collegiate athletics. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<table id="AutoNumber2" style="border-collapse: collapse;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="17%" align="right" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#111111">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<p align="center"><script type="text/javascript">&lt;!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2685298135293719";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
google_ad_format = "336x280_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel ="1771407080";
google_color_border = "FFFFFF";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "330099";
google_color_url = "CC3300";
google_color_text = "000000";
//--&gt;</script> <script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
            </script><script>google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);</script><ins style="border: medium none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: inline-table; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 336px;"><ins style="border: medium none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: block; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 336px;"></ins></ins></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span> <span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">If made law, SB 193 will prohibit California&#8217;s public and private          universities from belonging to any association that does not heed the          bill of rights&#8217; demands. These demands include the elimination of rules for the          terms or duration of scholarships below the cost of tuition and giving          an athlete the ability to transfer when his or her coach leaves the          school. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">The bill also highlights several pertinent issues that associations such          as the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics          need to consider. And the NCAA seems to be listening to some of these          concerns. Addressing one of the points outlined in the bill, the          association now allows all student-athletes to receive limited          legitimate earnings from on-campus and off-campus jobs, so long as the          money does not come from publicity or reputation for athletic ability. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> Neither side wins if the other does not back down. For example, the NCAA          loses the money generated from California schools if they withdraw, and          the schools lose the health care provided by the NCAA. In addition, the          law would bar California universities from competing against any          institution in the NCAA. This means student-athletes in the state are          taken out of the running for prestigious national championships and          other financial aid and academic award programs.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">Despite the concession by the NCAA, the legislation takes an          all-or-nothing approach to problems that could be resolved through          direct negotiations with the association. Passing SB 193 could cast the          state and the largest collegiate sports association in the nation into          political brinksmanship.</p>
<p>The bill threatens the growth posture of UC Davis athletics,          which is transitioning to Division-I NCAA status. prestige or          scholarships is the NCAA&#8217;s role in monitoring compliance with Title IX,          a law that bans sexual discrimination in federally funded education          programs and activities. Without some kind of supervision, withdrawal          from the NCAA threatens to undermine Title IX and the visibility it has          brought to women&#8217;s athletics.</p>
<p></span> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica; font-size: x-small;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"> The legislation has begun a dialogue that needs to continue. But it          should not pass in its current form because it represents neither the          best interests of student-athletes nor college athletics. </span> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monashliberals.org/california-set-to-be-the-first-state-to-have-a-bill-of-rights-for-college-athletes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
